|
Written by Dennis Alberto Jorolan & Violet Sung
|
|
Friday, 14 July 2006 |
|
Report for January-June, 2006
The interim report of the project is out this week. The main event covered was the writer workshop of the book project: Human Security-A Status Report. Please check out the following pdf link for details
|
|
|
Written by Dennis Alberto Jorolan
|
|
Tuesday, 13 June 2006 |
ARENA Conducts Writers Workshop on Human Security in Bangkok Ask
an activist in the street or a trade union organizer in the factory or
an urban poor community development worker, what “human security” is…
the most likely answer? Duh?
Pose the same question to a U.N. diplomat or a New York-based human
rights practitioner and a slew of jargon would spew forth from his/her
mouth describing the term with all the required whereases, insofars and
periods in time
The gap in understanding the term between those in the upper levels of
international diplomacy and the grassroots is the reason why there is
an urgent need to come up with a common set of language and tools that
can be used by those who formulate policy and concepts and those who
enforce or project these concepts at the grassroots. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
Written by WMP Program Team
|
|
Monday, 06 March 2006 |
Rationale of the projectSecurity is about the means that states use for the maintenance of territorial integrity, internal cohesion and political order. It involves the prevention of any threats and the use of force. National security is understood as a comprehensive framework which links the needs of domestic stability, economy and ideology to a states' national interest and strategic framework. Despite the fact that states are primarily concerned with their national security and spend much of their time and budgets to enhance this, conflicts have not decreased the world over. In Asia, the nature and range of conflicts has actually increased; the numbers of civilian casualties has continuously gone up and individuals, communities and groups actually feel more insecure today.
Perception of threats is the most important starting point for a conflict between collective groups and the resulting approaches for security by them. Understanding how a threat is perceived can be much more complicated a process than usually conceived. And threats are usually more constructed than simply given as real. The social and political dynamism surrounding construction of threats involves a complex interplay among state and non-state actors, identities and interests of collective groups involved, legitimisation of those identities and interests, and competition for available resources.
At the same time, threats do not automatically escalate into violent conflicts. They do only under certain conditions. Threats undergo a process of negotiation and redefinition by different actors and for different purposes. They are also heavily affected by existing security actors, and their beliefs and customs, and also by those who want to challenge such structure and customs. Understanding the competition and negotiation surrounding the construction of threats and their link with existing and emerging security practices, will provide us better with how to handle resulting conflicts. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|