Civil Society Activists Demand Accountability of the World Bank-IMF
Written by Mohiuddin Ahmad
Friday, 22 September 2006
The IPF held a small gathering in Batam and issued a statement that says 'no' to the way people's lives are being 'managed' by the 'axis of evil' comprised of the World Bank, IMF and the WTO, writes Mohiuddin Ahmad , September 20, 2006
When the annual general meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund were scheduled in Singapore, as a part of the ritual to hold such a meeting once in every three years outside Washington, DC, civil society organisations and groups representing social movements from across the globe started preparing to hold an International People's Forum in the same place to oppose the hegemonic economic globalisation led by the Bank-Fund and the neo-liberal policies of the global brokers.
Jubilee South, an anti-debt coalition of NGOs and movements, along with many other international and regional alliances and networks constituted an International People's Forum (IPF), with an objective to provide a broad platform to all participants for organising meetings, workshops and demonstrations. Main concerns and demands of the IPF were:
1. Immediate and 100% cancellation of multilateral debts as part of the total cancellation of debts claimed from the South, without externally imposed conditionality. 2. Open, transparent and participatory External Audit of the lending operations and related policies of the International Financial Institutions, beginning with the World Bank and IMF. 3. Stop the imposition of conditions and the promotion of neoliberal policies and projects. a. In this 50th anniversary year of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the IFIs end the promotion of privatisation of public services and the use of public resources to support private profits. b. Stop IFI funding and involvement in environmentally destructive projects, beginning with big dams, oil, gas and mining and implement the major recommendations of the Extractive Industries Review. c. Immediately stop imposing conditions that exacerbate health crises like the AIDS pandemic and make restitution for past practices such as requiring user fees for public education and health care services.
As the government of Singapore is insensitive to civil society organisations and wanted to give the northern guardians an image of a 'good boy', it had been very tough with the IPF. So the IPF decided earlier to organise their events in Batam, an Indonesian Island that can be accessed by ferry in forty minutes from Singapore.
Jubilee South partners in Indonesia put a lot of hard work to make the event a success where about twenty thousand civil society representatives from all over the world were expected to participate in various activities from 12 to 17 September. However, the Indonesian authorities at the last moment clamped a crackdown on the IPF. All activities of IPF were banned and only some events were allowed from 15 to 17 September. IPF thinks that the Indonesian police was instigated by the World Bank and the Singapore authorities to decide so.
There are also 'good boys' in the civil society who have happily been co-opted in the official meetings that took place in Singapore. But most of the activists decided to boycott. In he meantime, many CS activists started arriving Singapore to join IPF events, as there was hardly any time to reschedule. Several participants were detained at Singapore airport. Some were allowed to cross the immigration desk after long 48 hours of waiting and many were 'deported' back to their countries. This never happened in any previous meetings of the Bank-Fund. Although the Bank pretends to be a 'friend' of the civil society, and had been successful in co-opting and funding many NGOs, the Singapore and Indonesian governments behaved like 'more Catholic than the Pope'.
The IPF held a small gathering in Batam and issued a statement that says 'no' to the way people's lives are being 'managed' by the 'axis of evil' comprised of the World Bank, IMF and the WTO. The IPF statement Issued at Asrama Haji Batam Centre, Batam, Indonesia on 18 September 2006, the IPF statement says: International People's Forum organisers celebrate successful forum and share plans for ways forward. Today we conclude the International People's Forum vs. the IMF and World Bank (IPF), which was convened in Batam from September 15th to 17th. Over 500 Indonesians participated in the Forum, as did around 200 individuals from 25 countries representing at least 100 organisations. The IPF, like other similar fora, has successfully demonstrated to the world that many diverse civil society organisations and social movements can meet in peace and unity, and have meaningful, in-depth and informed discussions on the policies and practices of International Financial Institutions (IFIs). Despite the many hindrances suffered by IPF conveners and participants in organising and travelling to the Forum, we met in a spirit of solidarity and cooperation to share information, insights and strategies on critical issues facing communities and peoples affected by World Bank and IMF operations. We find the World Bank and IMF responsible for policies and actions that lead to the intensification of poverty and deprivation, the violation of basic human rights, the curtailment of basic political and civil liberties, the undermining of national sovereignty and democratic governance, and the subversion of the right to development. We call attention to the numerous obstacles we faced in preparing the Forum which, among other things, forced us to cancel outdoor events and caused at least 100 international (sic) individuals to forfeit their participation. Our reports indicate that at least 54 individuals from 17 organisations were either banned from entering Singapore, detained at the Singapore airport without explanation, subjected to custodial interrogation and, regrettably, some were even deported. Furthermore, many continue to face problems entering Singapore as they travel home. We have yet to receive any explanation from either the Singapore government or the World Bank and IMF on why this has happened. We take the World Bank and IMF to task for not meeting its promises to engage respectfully and openly with civil society organisations. The credibility of these promises has been seriously damaged ever since the World Bank and IMF were made aware of the restrictions Singapore would place on the freedom of assembly for civil society during the Annual Meetings. After it became clear to us that Singapore would not allow the Forum to take place within its borders, we moved the IPF to Batam, Indonesia. We pledge solidarity with those committed to building a vibrant civil society in states that restrict essential rights such as the freedom of speech and we appreciate the Indonesian Government for allowing us to host the Forum in Batam. In response to the banning and mistreatment of our colleagues, we launched a boycott of official engagement between the World Bank and IMF and civil society at the Annual Meetings. After individuals were 'un-banned,' we re-affirmed the boycott and labelled the actions of the Singapore Government as 'too little too late'. Each and every participating organisation will now and in the future critically re-examine its relationship vis-à-vis the World Bank and IMF and our future engagements, while not losing our focus on holding these institutions accountable for negative impacts associated with their operations. As a result of our analyses on the World Bank and IMF and drawing on our experiences in the last weeks, we make the following demands.
First, on the policies and practices of the World Bank and IMF, we re-invigorate The Global Call to Action Against the IFIs. In particular, we stress the urgent need for: 100 per cent cancellation of multilateral debt; open, transparent and participatory external audits of IFI lending and policies; stopping the imposition of policy conditions that undermine economic sovereignty and exacerbate crises in health and education; discontinuing the privatisation of public services; and ending IFI involvement in environmentally destructive projects.
Second, in response to the restrictions placed on the IPF initiative: We demand from the World Bank and IMF an explanation as to why they proceeded with Singapore as the venue of the Annual Meetings when restrictions on civil society engagement were evident months in advance. We demand the full disclosure of all information pertaining to civil society participation including the Memorandum of Understanding between the World Bank and Government of Singapore and official and un-official lists of so-called 'banned individuals' .
Third, to ensure that there is full accountability and transparency of the IFIs to peoples and communities that are affected by IFI operations: We call on the governments that are members of the World Bank and IMF Boards of Directors to keep these institutions fully accountable for their impacts on human rights, equity, and the sustainability of development.
Mohiuddin Ahmad, a researcher and writer, is Chairperson of CDL and Chairperson of Jubilee South-Asia Pacific Movement on Debt and Development. Email: